What Is Benchmark Valuation and Why Is It Important for Investors? (2026 Guide)

Benchmark valuation is the process of determining whether a company is fairly priced by comparing its valuation multiples — such as Price-to-Earnings (P/E), EV/EBITDA, and Price-to-Book (P/B) — against industry peers, sector averages, or historical standards. Also called relative valuation or comparable company analysis (Comps), it answers the investor’s core question: “Am I paying the right price compared to what the market pays for similar companies?”

It is widely used in equity investing, M&A due diligence, IPO pricing, ESOP valuation, and SEBI-regulated transactions in India.

Every investment decision carries the same hidden question: are you paying the right price?

Absolute valuation methods like Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) attempt to answer this by projecting future cash flows and discounting them to present value. Useful — but time-intensive, assumption-heavy, and difficult to explain to a board or investment committee in a single page.

Benchmark valuation solves this differently. Instead of modelling a company from scratch, it asks: how is the market valuing similar companies right now?

If comparable companies trade at 15× earnings and the company you’re evaluating trades at 10× earnings with a similar growth profile, it may be undervalued relative to peers. If it trades at 25× with lower growth, it may be overvalued. The comparison is fast, market-grounded, and universally understood.

This guide covers everything investors, CFOs, and M&A professionals in India need to know about benchmark valuation — from core metrics and sector multiples to SEBI compliance requirements and how to avoid the most costly mistakes.

Benchmark valuation — also called relative valuation, comparable company analysis (Comps), or trading comps — is a market-based approach to determining the fair value of a company or asset by reference to how similar companies are currently priced by the market.

It is one of three primary valuation approaches recognised under:

• Indian Valuation Standards (IVS) issued by ICAI’s Valuation Standards Board
• IBBI (Registered Valuers and Valuation) Rules, 2017
• SEBI circulars on fairness opinions and related-party transactions
• International Valuation Standards (IVS) for cross-border transactions

The other two approaches — the Income Approach (DCF) and the Asset/Cost Approach (NAV) — are stronger for intrinsic value analysis, but benchmark valuation provides the crucial market-reality check: is the price you’re paying consistent with what the market is actually paying for similar companies today?

Benchmark Valuation vs. Intrinsic (DCF) Valuation — Key Differences

India’s capital markets have scaled dramatically. According to SEBI’s Annual Report 2024–25, India ranked among the top 5 globally by IPO count, with over ₹1.7 lakh crore raised through public issues. M&A deal volumes have stayed robust, with cross-border acquisitions increasingly scrutinised by regulators for fair pricing.

In this environment, benchmark valuation is not optional — it is a commercial necessity and, in many cases, a legal one:

Commercial reasons:

• IPO valuations frequently exceed peer benchmarks during hot market cycles — benchmark analysis identifies when to wait
• M&A sellers anchor to aspirational prices; buyers need benchmark data to negotiate effectively
• PE and VC investors use sector multiples to establish entry and exit valuations

Regulatory reasons:

• SEBI mandates market-approach benchmarks in fairness opinions for related-party transactions, mergers, and delistings
• ICAI’s IVS require market approach as one of three mandated valuation approaches
• Under IBC, IBBI-registered valuers must consider market approach alongside income and cost approaches
• FEMA pricing norms for inbound FDI and share transfers require market-referenced valuations

🔍 Need a Certified Benchmark Valuation Report?

Whether you’re closing an M&A deal, meeting SEBI compliance,
or pricing a fundraising round — RNC’s IBBI-registered valuers
deliver benchmark valuation reports accepted by SEBI, NCLT,
RBI, and Income Tax authorities.

✅ IBBI Registered Valuers
✅ Compliant with ICAI IVS & SEBI norms
✅ Trusted across Mumbai, Ahmedabad, Gurugram & Vadodara

📞 Call: +91 9737033380

1. Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio — The Most Widely Used Benchmark

What it is: The P/E ratio measures how much investors are willing to pay for ₹1 of a company’s earnings.

Formula: P/E = Market Price Per Share ÷ Earnings Per Share (EPS)

Example: If a company’s shares trade at ₹500 and its EPS is ₹25, the P/E ratio is 20×. This means investors pay ₹20 for every ₹1 of profit.

When to use: Mature, profitable companies with stable, predictable earnings — FMCG, private banking, established IT services, pharmaceuticals.

Key limitation: Not meaningful for loss-making companies. Vulnerable to accounting adjustments and one-time items. High-growth companies naturally have elevated P/Es that can mislead without context (see PEG ratio below).

Indian Market P/E Benchmarks — 2026:

2. EV/EBITDA — The Most Reliable Cross-Company Benchmark for M&A

What it is: EV/EBITDA measures how many years of operating profit (EBITDA) it would take to repay the full acquisition price (Enterprise Value) of a company.

Formula:

• Enterprise Value (EV) = Market Capitalisation + Total Debt + Minority Interest + Preferred Stock − Cash & Equivalents
• EV/EBITDA = Enterprise Value ÷ EBITDA

Why M&A professionals prefer EV/EBITDA over P/E:

• Capital-structure neutral — removes the effect of how the company is financed (debt vs. equity), enabling apples-to-apples comparison
• Removes non-cash charges — adds back depreciation and amortisation, better for asset-heavy industries
• Tax-rate neutral — comparable across companies in different tax brackets or geographies

When to use: Manufacturing, infrastructure, telecom, energy, capital-intensive industries; all M&A transactions; cross-border comparisons.

Read more: does impairment affect ebitda in 2026 full guide examples

Indian Market EV/EBITDA Benchmarks — 2026:

3. Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio — The Primary Metric for Financial Institutions

What it is: P/B compares a company’s market price to its accounting net asset value (book value per share).

Formula: P/B = Market Price Per Share ÷ Book Value Per Share Where: Book Value Per Share = (Total Assets − Total Liabilities) ÷ Shares Outstanding

What it tells you: A P/B of 3× means the market values the company at three times its stated net assets — the premium reflects expected return on equity, brand, management quality, and growth prospects.

When to use: Banks and financial institutions (where book value is the primary value anchor); real estate holding companies; asset-heavy businesses; companies being assessed for liquidation value.

Return on Equity (ROE) and P/B are inseparable: A bank with 20% ROE justifies a higher P/B than a bank with 10% ROE. Always read P/B alongside ROE.

Indian Banking & NBFC P/B Benchmarks — 2026:

4. EV/Revenue (Price-to-Sales) Ratio — For High-Growth and Pre-Profit Companies

What it is: EV/Revenue benchmarks a company’s total enterprise value against its annual revenue — useful when there are no earnings to benchmark.

Formula: EV/Revenue = Enterprise Value ÷ Annual Revenue

When to use: High-growth companies with no or negative earnings — SaaS, fintech, e-commerce, deep tech, healthcare tech startups; pre-profitability businesses in Series B and later stages.

The key driver: The appropriate EV/Revenue multiple depends on gross margin and growth rate. A SaaS company with 75% gross margins and 50% revenue growth justifies a much higher multiple than a low-margin e-commerce business growing at 20%.

Indian EV/Revenue Benchmarks — 2026:

5. PEG Ratio (Price/Earnings to Growth) — Adjusting P/E for Growth

What it is: The PEG ratio corrects P/E’s biggest blind spot — it doesn’t account for how fast a company is growing. PEG divides P/E by the annual earnings growth rate to create a growth-adjusted valuation measure.

Formula: PEG = P/E Ratio ÷ Annual Earnings Growth Rate (%)

Interpretation:

• PEG < 1.0 → potentially undervalued relative to growth
• PEG = 1.0 → considered fairly valued
• PEG > 2.0 → potentially overvalued for the growth rate

Worked example:

Company A: P/E = 30×, earnings growth = 30% → PEG = 1.0 (fairly valued) Company B: P/E = 30×, earnings growth = 12% → PEG = 2.5 (potentially overvalued)

Both have the same P/E, but Company B is paying the same price for less than half the growth rate. PEG reveals this.

When to use: Comparing IT, pharma, and consumer growth stocks in India where P/E alone can be misleading due to varying growth profiles across companies in the same sector.

6. Dividend Yield — For Income-Focused and Institutional Benchmarking

What it is: Dividend yield measures the annual dividend a company pays as a percentage of its current share price.

Formula: Dividend Yield = (Annual Dividend Per Share ÷ Market Price Per Share) × 100

When to use: Mature, income-generating companies — PSUs, utilities, REITs, infrastructure investment trusts (InvITs); benchmarking for institutional investors with yield mandates.

Indian Dividend Yield Benchmarks — 2026:

Step 1: Define the Subject Company

Before selecting any peers, clearly establish:

• Core business activity and revenue model (manufacturing vs. distribution vs. services)
• Industry classification — GICS (Global Industry Classification Standard) codes or NIC codes used by India’s Ministry of Statistics
• Business stage (growth, mature, distressed)
• Geography and primary customer base

Why this matters: A company classified as “healthcare” could be a hospital chain, a pharma manufacturer, or a health-tech SaaS. Each has entirely different peer groups and benchmark multiples.

Step 2: Select Comparable Companies — The Most Critical Step

The quality of a benchmark valuation is only as good as its peer selection. Poor peers produce a defensible-looking but meaningless result.

Mandatory similarity criteria:

• Same industry or sub-sector (hospital chains vs. hospital chains, not hospital chains vs. diagnostic labs)
• Similar business model
• Comparable revenue scale (large-caps vs. small-caps distort multiples significantly)
• Similar market geography (Indian market benchmarks for India-focused companies)

Desirable similarity criteria:

• Similar growth rate profile (high-growth vs. mature)
• Similar margin structure (EBITDA margin ± 5%)
• Similar capital intensity

Peer group sizing rules:

• Minimum: 5 companies (below 5, statistical reliability collapses)
• Optimal: 8–12 companies
• Maximum: 15 companies (above this, heterogeneity erodes the benchmark’s meaning)

Sources for India-listed peer comparables:

• NSE and BSE listed company data (publicly available)
• Bloomberg Terminal (institutional access)
• Capitaline, Ace Equity, Prowess databases
• SEBI-filed fairness opinion reports (publicly available for listed company transactions on SEBI’s EDIFAR/SCORES portal)
• Damodaran’s annual industry multiples database (pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar) — includes India-specific data updated annually

Step 3: Calculate Multiples for All Peers

For each comparable company, calculate:

NTM vs TTM — which to use?

• NTM (Next Twelve Months / Forward): Based on analyst consensus earnings projections. More predictive. Use when reliable forecasts exist for peers.
• TTM (Trailing Twelve Months): Based on actual reported financials. More factual. Use for mature companies where historical performance predicts future well.
• Best practice: Use NTM multiples for growing companies; TTM for stable/mature companies. Always be consistent across the peer group.

Step 4: Build the Benchmark Statistics Table

Compile peer multiples and calculate the statistical summary:

Always use median, not mean. One outlier company (a recent acquisition target trading at a control premium, or a distressed company at a deep discount) can skew the mean significantly. The median is robust to outliers.

Step 5: Apply Benchmarks to the Subject Company

Multiply the peer median (or appropriate percentile, with justification) by the subject company’s financial metrics:

Implied Value — P/E Method:
= Peer Median P/E × Subject Company EPS
= 20× × ₹50 EPS = ₹1,000 per share

Implied Enterprise Value — EV/EBITDA Method:
= Peer Median EV/EBITDA × Subject Company EBITDA
= 12× × ₹500 crore = ₹6,000 crore EV
→ Implied Equity Value = ₹6,000 crore − ₹800 crore Net Debt = ₹5,200 crore
→ Implied Price per Share = ₹5,200 crore ÷ 5 crore shares = ₹1,040

Step 6: Triangulate Using a “Football Field” Chart

A football field chart is a visual summary used by investment bankers and valuers to display the valuation range implied by each method side by side. It gets its name from its appearance — horizontal bars of different lengths representing different methods.

Method           | Implied Share Price Range
-----------------|---------------------------
P/E (Comps)      | ₹900 ─────────── ₹1,100
EV/EBITDA        | ₹980 ──────────────── ₹1,200
P/B              | ₹850 ──────── ₹1,050
DCF (Cross-check)| ₹950 ──────────── ₹1,150
-----------------|---------------------------
Combined Range   | ₹900 ────────────── ₹1,150
Current Price    | ₹850 (below range → potentially undervalued)

This visual makes the valuation conclusion immediately interpretable for boards, investors, and courts.

Benchmark multiples from listed company trading prices reflect minority, non-controlling, marketable interests. When your valuation situation differs, adjustments are required:

Control Premium: When acquiring a controlling stake (typically 51%+), the acquirer pays a premium above the listed price — typically 20–40% in Indian M&A transactions — to reflect the value of control (ability to direct strategy, dividends, and management).

Minority Discount / Lack of Control Discount (LOCD): When valuing a minority stake in a private company, a discount is applied to reflect the inability to control business decisions. Typically 15–30%.

Marketability Discount / Lack of Marketability Discount (LOMD): Private company shares cannot be freely traded. This lack of liquidity commands an additional discount — typically 15–30% for Indian private companies — applied on top of LOCD.

For private company benchmark valuation: Indicated Value = Listed Peer Multiple × Subject’s Financial Metric × (1 − Minority Discount) × (1 − Marketability Discount)

These adjustments are documented in ICAI Valuation Standards and expected in IBBI-submitted valuation reports.

Benchmark valuation is not only for listed companies. Indian private companies require benchmark-based valuations for fundraising, ESOP pricing, FEMA compliance, and M&A. When listed peers are unavailable or limited:

Option 1: Use listed peers from adjacent sub-sectors — with clear documentation of comparability and size adjustments.

Option 2: Use precedent transactions — valuation multiples implied by recent private M&A deals in the same sector. Sources: Grant Thornton Deal Tracker, KPMG M&A Trends, VCCEdge transaction database.

Option 3: Use global comparables + country risk adjustment — if Indian peers are insufficient, use US/UK listed peers and adjust for India country risk premium (typically 3–5% higher cost of equity).

Option 4: Use revenue benchmarks from VC/PE funding databases — for early-stage companies, AngelList, Tracxn, and Inc42’s funding tracker provide revenue multiples implied by recent Indian startup funding rounds.

SEBI Requirements

SEBI mandates benchmark-based valuation evidence in the following regulatory contexts:

Before relying on any benchmark valuation, verify:

•  Peer group has minimum 5 comparable companies
•  All peers are in the same industry/sub-sector
•  Market capitalisation scale is similar (no mega-caps benchmarking mid-caps)
•  Using forward (NTM) multiples where available — not just trailing
•  Using median, not mean, to reduce outlier distortion
•  At least 2 different metrics used (e.g., P/E + EV/EBITDA)
•  Adjustments made for company-specific risk/premium factors
•  Cross-checked with at least one absolute method (DCF or NAV)
•  For SEBI-regulated transactions — report prepared by a registered valuer

ICAI Valuation Standards Board (IVS)

ICAI’s Indian Valuation Standards specify that the Market Approach (which includes comparable company analysis) is one of three primary valuation approaches. IVS require:

• Documentation of peer selection rationale and similarity criteria
• Disclosure of adjustments made to benchmark multiples for company-specific factors
• Use of median rather than mean for peer statistics

Reference: ICAI Valuation Standards 2018

IBBI — IBC Context

Under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, IBBI-registered valuers submit two independent valuations — Fair Value and Liquidation Value — for corporate debtors under CIRP. Benchmark multiples from the Market Approach serve as market-side evidence, particularly for enterprise-level business valuations.

Reference: IBBI (Registered Valuers and Valuation) Rules, 2017

Income Tax Act

Section 56(2)(viib) — commonly called the “angel tax” provision — requires that shares issued to investors are valued at Fair Market Value. CBDT Rule 11UA specifies two permitted methods: the Discounted Cash Flow method and the Net Asset Value method. However, benchmark valuation is used as a cross-check and market-context evidence in investor negotiations and CA-certified valuation reports.

Limitations of Benchmark Valuation — And How to Mitigate Each

Before relying on any benchmark valuation report, verify:

• Peer group has a minimum of 5 comparable companies
• All peers are in the same industry sub-sector, not just the same broad sector
• Market capitalisation scale is comparable (large-caps vs. small-caps distort multiples)
• Using NTM (forward) multiples where reliable forecasts exist — not only trailing
• Using median, not mean, to reduce outlier distortion
• At least 2 different metrics used (e.g., P/E + EV/EBITDA)
• Adjustments documented for company-specific factors (size, liquidity, control, geography)
• Private company discounts applied if subject is unlisted (LOCD + LOMD)
• Cross-checked with at least one absolute method (DCF or NAV)
• For SEBI-regulated transactions: report prepared by an IBBI-registered or SEBI-recognised valuer
• External regulatory sources cited (SEBI, ICAI, IBBI) for compliance context
• Football field chart included for board/committee presentation

Illustrative Case 1 — IPO Overvaluation (IT Sector)

Scenario: A technology services company prepares to list at a price implying a P/E of 80× — well above the sector peer range of 25–40× for comparable listed Indian IT companies of similar scale.

Benchmark analysis: The IPO price implies a ~60–100% premium to peer median P/E. Peers with higher revenue growth and larger market share trade at 35–40×; the subject company’s growth rate is 15%.

Outcome pattern: Investors who applied benchmark discipline at IPO and waited for the post-listing correction — typically 20–35% below IPO price for overpriced listings within 6 months — captured a significant cost advantage.

Lesson: IPO valuations frequently exceed peer benchmarks in active market cycles. Benchmark analysis is the fastest way to identify hype premium detachment from peer-based fair value.

Illustrative Case 2 — M&A Renegotiation (Manufacturing Sector)

Scenario: An acquirer receives a seller-side valuation for a mid-sized Indian manufacturer implying an EV/EBITDA of 18× — against a sector peer range of 10–13× for comparable manufacturers.

Benchmark analysis: No listed peer in the sector trades above 14×. The 18× ask implies a 38–80% premium above market comps, with no identifiable reason (unique technology, regulatory moat, or significant growth acceleration) to justify the gap.

Outcome pattern: Armed with benchmark data, the buyer negotiates down to 13–14× EV/EBITDA — consistent with a modest control premium above peer median — saving significant transaction value.

Lesson: In M&A, benchmark valuation is the buyer’s strongest negotiating tool. Without it, sellers always anchor to aspirational valuations.

Illustrative Case 3 — Portfolio Screening (Banking Sector)

Scenario: An investor evaluates two private sector banks with nearly identical fundamentals — ROE ~17%, NPA ~1.8%, 3-year EPS growth ~20%. Bank A trades at P/B of 2.1×; Bank B at P/B of 4.3×. Sector benchmark for this ROE/NPA profile: 2.8–3.5×.

Benchmark analysis: Both banks have similar fundamental quality. Bank A trades at a 25% discount to the sector benchmark; Bank B trades at a 25–50% premium. No material difference in asset quality, growth, or dividend policy justifies a 2× P/B gap.

Outcome pattern: Overweighting Bank A and underweighting Bank B captures the mean-reversion of the valuation gap over the following 12–18 months.

Lesson: When fundamentals are similar, benchmark valuation reveals pricing gaps that pure fundamental analysis misses.

1. What is benchmark valuation in simple terms?

Benchmark valuation is a way of checking whether a company’s price is fair by comparing it to similar companies. If your company trades at 20× earnings and comparable companies trade at 15×, you’re paying a premium — which may or may not be justified by superior quality. It’s the financial equivalent of checking comparable property prices before buying a house.

2. What is the difference between benchmark valuation and intrinsic valuation?

Intrinsic (absolute) valuation — such as DCF — builds a standalone model of a company’s value based on its future cash flows. Benchmark (relative) valuation compares the company against market prices of similar companies. DCF tells you what a company is fundamentally worth; benchmark valuation tells you what the market is paying for similar companies today. Best practice combines both — use benchmark to set market context, DCF to test if intrinsic value supports the price.

3. What is a football field chart in valuation?

A football field chart is a horizontal bar chart used to display the valuation range from multiple methods side by side. Each horizontal bar represents one method’s implied value range (e.g., P/E comps, EV/EBITDA comps, DCF). The chart makes it easy to see where ranges overlap (the “consensus” valuation zone) and where they diverge. It is standard in investment banking pitch books and valuation reports submitted to boards and audit committees.

4. What is NTM vs. TTM in benchmark valuation?

TTM (Trailing Twelve Months) uses the last 12 months of actual reported financial data. NTM (Next Twelve Months / Forward) uses analyst consensus projections for the next 12 months. NTM multiples are more predictive for growing companies and are preferred when reliable forecasts exist. TTM is used for mature, stable companies where recent history is the best guide to future performance. Always maintain consistency — compare NTM to NTM, TTM to TTM — across the peer group.

5. How do I benchmark a private company when there are no listed Indian peers?

Three approaches: (1) Use listed peers from adjacent or broader sub-sectors with documented comparability adjustments; (2) Use precedent transaction multiples from recent private M&A deals in the sector (available through VCCEdge, Grant Thornton Deal Tracker); (3) Use global listed comparables and adjust for India country risk premium. Apply minority discount (15–30%) and lack-of-marketability discount (15–30%) to the resulting value, as private company shares lack the liquidity of listed stocks.

6. What is a control premium in benchmark valuation?

When an acquirer purchases a controlling interest (typically 51%+) in a company, they pay a premium above the listed market price — called the control premium — to compensate the seller for transferring control. In Indian M&A transactions, control premiums typically range from 20–40% above the pre-announcement share price. Benchmark multiples from listed peer trading prices reflect minority, non-controlling interests — so a control premium must be added when valuing a controlling stake acquisition.

7. Which benchmark valuation metric is most commonly used in India?

P/E is the most widely quoted for listed equity investing and equity analyst reports. EV/EBITDA is the most commonly used in M&A transactions and for cross-company comparisons where capital structure varies. P/B is the primary metric for banking sector valuations. SEBI-regulated transactions (fairness opinions, open offers, delistings) typically require multiple metrics to be presented and reconciled in the valuation report.

8. Is benchmark valuation accepted by SEBI, ICAI, and IBBI?

Yes. SEBI mandates benchmark-based evidence in fairness opinions, open offer pricing, delisting valuations, and related-party transaction reports. ICAI’s Valuation Standards Board includes market approach (comparable company analysis) as one of three primary approaches in Indian Valuation Standards 2018. IBBI-registered valuers are required to consider the market approach alongside income and cost approaches in all IBC-related valuations.

9. What are typical EV/EBITDA multiples for Indian startups?

Indian startups rarely have EBITDA in early stages, so EV/Revenue is more applicable. For Series B and later-stage startups with positive EBITDA, peer multiples from comparable listed companies are used as a starting point, then adjusted for size, liquidity, and growth differences. Typical EV/EBITDA ranges for profitable Indian tech startups: SaaS (15–25×), Fintech (10–18×), Healthcare tech (12–20×). IBBI-registered valuers and SEBI-registered merchant bankers apply these benchmarks in ESOP valuations and investor round certifications.

10. How often should benchmark multiples be updated?

For actively managed portfolios: quarterly, or after major market events (RBI rate changes, SEBI regulatory shifts, major index rebalancing). For SEBI-regulated transactions: the valuation date is typically within 60–90 days of the transaction — older benchmark data requires fresh benchmarking. For annual ESOP pricing: each year’s grant requires a fresh valuation as of the grant date.

11. What are the most common mistakes in benchmark valuation?

The five most costly mistakes: (1) selecting peers from different industries or business models; (2) using mean instead of median — distorted by outliers; (3) not using forward multiples when projections are available; (4) applying a single metric in isolation; (5) ignoring private company discounts for unlisted companies. Benchmark valuation must always be cross-checked with at least one absolute method.

12. Where can I find Indian sector benchmark multiples?

Key sources: NSE/BSE listed company data, Bloomberg Terminal, Capitaline database, Ace Equity, SEBI’s EDIFAR portal (fairness opinion reports for listed company transactions), and Prof. Aswath Damodaran’s annual industry multiples database at pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar — which includes India-specific data updated every January.

Benchmark valuation is one of the most powerful tools in a financial professional’s toolkit precisely because it anchors analysis to market reality. It moves the conversation from theoretical projections to the prices actual market participants are paying for comparable assets today.

For Indian investors, M&A professionals, and CFOs, benchmark valuation serves three distinct purposes:

Commercially: It prevents overpayment in acquisitions, flags overpriced IPOs, and surfaces undervalued portfolio opportunities by comparing against sector standards.

Regulatorily: SEBI, ICAI, and IBBI all require market approach evidence in certified valuation reports — benchmark valuation is not optional for regulated transactions in India.

Strategically: Combined with DCF, it provides the two-lens view that sophisticated investors and boards require — what is the company intrinsically worth, and what is the market paying for similar companies today?

The limitations are real — benchmark valuation embeds market sentiment, requires comparable peers, and cannot capture unique value. These are not reasons to avoid it; they are reasons to use it alongside absolute methods and to invest in the quality of peer selection.

Need a certified benchmark valuation report?

RNC Valuecon LLP’s IBBI-registered valuers deliver market-approach valuation reports trusted by leading corporates, PE firms, NCLT/NCLAT proceedings, and SEBI-regulated transactions across India.

Book a Consultation →